I talked about feature #9865 on my fedi account and received a comment like, "I don't care about emoji reactions in my timelines, but I do care what reactions I get!"
Adding too many options is bad, but I agreed that making it toggleable whether to disable emojis in notifications is helpful, so I added this feature. This allows you to check emoji reactions to your posts in notifications while using the simple UI. I'd say this provides an experience that neither Mastodon nor Misskey has.
The new setting item shows up only when you disable emoji reactions.
Co-authored-by: naskya <m@naskya.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9880
Co-authored-by: naskya <naskya@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: naskya <naskya@noreply.codeberg.org>
This follows up #9869, with an awaited ``next()``, fixing the script.
> I'm looking to remove another 5kb package, replacing it with an in-house script. The commit i'm proposing translates the entire job of koa-remove-trailing-slashes into a 206 byte script that gets the job done well.
(just to show the code does work)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9870
Co-authored-by: daikei <daikei@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: daikei <daikei@noreply.codeberg.org>
I'm looking to remove another 5kb package, replacing it with an in-house script. The commit i'm proposing translates the entire job of `koa-remove-trailing-slashes` into a 206 byte script that gets the job done well.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9869
Co-authored-by: daikei <daikei@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: daikei <daikei@noreply.codeberg.org>
I think this will solve the continuation issue in threads where the reply level reaches 12 deep in the conversation thread, without getting to indent depth 5.
Co-authored-by: Kaity A <kaity@theallans.com.au>
Co-authored-by: Kaity A <supakaity@blahaj.zone>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9821
Co-authored-by: Kaity A <supakaity@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Kaity A <supakaity@noreply.codeberg.org>
Related: #9816#9830
I was so careless that I didn't know "Search" was also a keyword. I disabled that and fixed a minor bug.
Co-authored-by: naskya <m@naskya.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9856
Co-authored-by: naskya <naskya@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: naskya <naskya@noreply.codeberg.org>
Honestly, this workaround is pure garbage when this can be achieved by deleting a small piece of code from mfm-js, but this closes#9816 anyway 😅
Co-authored-by: naskya <m@naskya.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9830
Co-authored-by: naskya <naskya@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: naskya <naskya@noreply.codeberg.org>
Cherry-picked from FoundKey/c414f24a2c ([commit](c414f24a2c))
This allows us to hide specified users' boosts from the timelines (the boosts will still be visible on their user page).
Co-authored-by: Hélène <pleroma-dev@helene.moe>
Co-authored-by: naskya <m@naskya.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9825
Co-authored-by: naskya <naskya@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: naskya <naskya@noreply.codeberg.org>
This simply adds a basic admin UI to blocklist some hashtags from displaying in
the trending widget. The facility existed already in the backend, but there was
no UI to manipulate the list save for executing raw SQL or API calls.
Closes#9712.
Co-authored-by: Kaity A <kaity@theallans.com.au>
Co-authored-by: Ken Allan <ken@norganna.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9820
Co-authored-by: Kaity A <supakaity@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Kaity A <supakaity@noreply.codeberg.org>
Bad UX when a post is muted and it just says "Some chick said something". Now
provide some context too to help people decide if they want to view something
potentially triggering.
Because the admin meta information was never loaded on this page, no amount of toggling the block or suspend sliders on the instance-info page (e.g. `https://calckey.example.com/instance-info/instance.tld`) will result in the instance actually being added to the blocklist. You could still do it from the bulk blocklist management page, but that can get unwieldy quickly if you just want to do a quick block of an instance.
Co-authored-by: amy bones <amy@spookygirl.boo>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9809
Co-authored-by: amybones <amybones@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: amybones <amybones@noreply.codeberg.org>
