This PR adds a feature to prevent users from creating a new account with a reserved username such as root, admin, system, proxy, info, etc...
Reserved usernames can be configured via the config file.
The administrator can create an account with a reserved username via the first setup screen or the control panel.
The existing account of reserved usernames will not be affected.
Co-authored-by: Namekuji <nmkj@mx.kazuno.co>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9917
Co-authored-by: Namekuji <nmkj@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Namekuji <nmkj@noreply.codeberg.org>
It looks like url validations are added in f7564d87b0, but I found another validation commit not applied in Calckey, so I cherry-picked 0da0cc80b9 from [Misskey](https://github.com/misskey-dev/misskey).
Co-authored-by: syuilo <Syuilotan@yahoo.co.jp>
Co-authored-by: naskya <m@naskya.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9882
Co-authored-by: naskya <naskya@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: naskya <naskya@noreply.codeberg.org>
This follows up #9869, with an awaited ``next()``, fixing the script.
> I'm looking to remove another 5kb package, replacing it with an in-house script. The commit i'm proposing translates the entire job of koa-remove-trailing-slashes into a 206 byte script that gets the job done well.
(just to show the code does work)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9870
Co-authored-by: daikei <daikei@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: daikei <daikei@noreply.codeberg.org>
I'm looking to remove another 5kb package, replacing it with an in-house script. The commit i'm proposing translates the entire job of `koa-remove-trailing-slashes` into a 206 byte script that gets the job done well.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9869
Co-authored-by: daikei <daikei@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: daikei <daikei@noreply.codeberg.org>
Cherry-picked from FoundKey/c414f24a2c ([commit](c414f24a2c))
This allows us to hide specified users' boosts from the timelines (the boosts will still be visible on their user page).
Co-authored-by: Hélène <pleroma-dev@helene.moe>
Co-authored-by: naskya <m@naskya.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9825
Co-authored-by: naskya <naskya@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: naskya <naskya@noreply.codeberg.org>
Closes#9712.
Co-authored-by: Kaity A <kaity@theallans.com.au>
Co-authored-by: Ken Allan <ken@norganna.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9820
Co-authored-by: Kaity A <supakaity@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Kaity A <supakaity@noreply.codeberg.org>
Bad UX when a post is muted and it just says "Some chick said something". Now
provide some context too to help people decide if they want to view something
potentially triggering.
Because the admin meta information was never loaded on this page, no amount of toggling the block or suspend sliders on the instance-info page (e.g. `https://calckey.example.com/instance-info/instance.tld`) will result in the instance actually being added to the blocklist. You could still do it from the bulk blocklist management page, but that can get unwieldy quickly if you just want to do a quick block of an instance.
Co-authored-by: amy bones <amy@spookygirl.boo>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9809
Co-authored-by: amybones <amybones@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: amybones <amybones@noreply.codeberg.org>
