This PR adds a feature to prevent users from creating a new account with a reserved username such as root, admin, system, proxy, info, etc...
Reserved usernames can be configured via the config file.
The administrator can create an account with a reserved username via the first setup screen or the control panel.
The existing account of reserved usernames will not be affected.
Co-authored-by: Namekuji <nmkj@mx.kazuno.co>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9917
Co-authored-by: Namekuji <nmkj@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Namekuji <nmkj@noreply.codeberg.org>
Moved a lot of the duplicated code in the different note components into the SubNoteContent component
I've also replaced the detailed note stuff with just the MkNote component
Co-authored-by: Freeplay <Freeplay@duck.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9888
Co-authored-by: Free <freeplay@duck.com>
Co-committed-by: Free <freeplay@duck.com>
It looks like url validations are added in f7564d87b0, but I found another validation commit not applied in Calckey, so I cherry-picked 0da0cc80b9 from [Misskey](https://github.com/misskey-dev/misskey).
Co-authored-by: syuilo <Syuilotan@yahoo.co.jp>
Co-authored-by: naskya <m@naskya.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9882
Co-authored-by: naskya <naskya@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: naskya <naskya@noreply.codeberg.org>
I talked about feature #9865 on my fedi account and received a comment like, "I don't care about emoji reactions in my timelines, but I do care what reactions I get!"
Adding too many options is bad, but I agreed that making it toggleable whether to disable emojis in notifications is helpful, so I added this feature. This allows you to check emoji reactions to your posts in notifications while using the simple UI. I'd say this provides an experience that neither Mastodon nor Misskey has.
The new setting item shows up only when you disable emoji reactions.
Co-authored-by: naskya <m@naskya.net>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9880
Co-authored-by: naskya <naskya@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: naskya <naskya@noreply.codeberg.org>
This follows up #9869, with an awaited ``next()``, fixing the script.
> I'm looking to remove another 5kb package, replacing it with an in-house script. The commit i'm proposing translates the entire job of koa-remove-trailing-slashes into a 206 byte script that gets the job done well.
(just to show the code does work)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9870
Co-authored-by: daikei <daikei@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: daikei <daikei@noreply.codeberg.org>
I'm looking to remove another 5kb package, replacing it with an in-house script. The commit i'm proposing translates the entire job of `koa-remove-trailing-slashes` into a 206 byte script that gets the job done well.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9869
Co-authored-by: daikei <daikei@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: daikei <daikei@noreply.codeberg.org>
I think this will solve the continuation issue in threads where the reply level reaches 12 deep in the conversation thread, without getting to indent depth 5.
Co-authored-by: Kaity A <kaity@theallans.com.au>
Co-authored-by: Kaity A <supakaity@blahaj.zone>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/calckey/calckey/pulls/9821
Co-authored-by: Kaity A <supakaity@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Kaity A <supakaity@noreply.codeberg.org>
